Would You Rather... Marry a boring millionaire or… a brilliant starving artist?
Another great question courtesy of Zobmondo. . . .I think that I would definitely go with the artist. We all know that money doesn't buy happiness and I love the creative insightful minds of artists. I guess I just appreciate it. And while marrying a billionaire I am sure has it's benefits, and if you know me, I could carry on a conversation with a brick wall, I need more. Boring is not for me.
What about you?
8 comments:
Stumbled on your blog - very nice and well put together. Note "Time in a bottle" is my all time favourite song ever - and I think Jim Groce is a genius.
I would marry the billionaire and have an affair with the starving artist.............LOL
I think I'd go for the billionaire and then make sure I surrounded myself with a fabulous entourage of stimulating and exciting people.
Does that make me shallow? I can justify it by saying sometimes boring is better than the drama drama drama of the tempermental passionate artist.
Billionaire! You can cultivate some sort of interest, I believe anyway. Plus, already dated a starving artist and I'm ready for the $$$! ;)
I would take the starving artist every time. And twice on Sundays. ;)
Hum...i think i'd take the billionaire with NO prenup and drop him after x amout of years and go get my starving artist.
Funny thing, i'm about to marry a starving artist. My plan didn't work out so well! :) Fun Post J!
I'd like to say starving artist, but at this point in my life I might have to go with boring billionaire. He'd be boring, yes, but it would be THRILLING to see what life could be like with no financial worries!
Also making the assumption that the starving artist is going to be depressed and would need lots of cheering up all the time...again, I don't have it in me any longer to take on a project like that.
my friends' husband brought this book to a barbeque once, we had a field day with it!
Post a Comment